Support tickets are more than just operational issues — they are micro-moments of truth in the customer journey. When handled poorly, they become bottlenecks to value realization, hidden churn signals, and points of tension between customers and the teams tasked with serving them. Yet more often than not, Customer Success Managers (CSMs) are caught in the middle — translating, chasing, escalating, and apologizing.
Support tickets are more than just operational issues — they are micro-moments of truth in the customer journey. When handled poorly, they become bottlenecks to value realization, hidden churn signals, and points of tension between customers and the teams tasked with serving them. Yet more often than not, Customer Success Managers (CSMs) are caught in the middle — translating, chasing, escalating, and apologizing. This is not the role they were hired for. And worse, it erodes trust in both directions.
In an age where customers expect real-time updates, self-service visibility, and proactive support, the tools most CSMs are forced to work with are anything but collaborative. When tickets are siloed inside Salesforce, Zendesk, ServiceNow, Jira, or Aha!, the burden of information routing falls squarely on the CSM — not the systems.
This guide is your playbook for transforming that dynamic. It introduces a “white glove” model of ticket management where CSMs partner with customers in full transparency, where ticket flows are mapped into real-time RACI matrices, and where visibility, responsibility, and resolution can be extended to both vendor and customer stakeholders. With ezRACI’s dynamic matrix model and fully documented RESTful API, support ticket workflows can now be extended, integrated, and collaboratively managed — at scale.
Let’s dive in.
Consider this real-world scenario: A customer is implementing a complex integration, but a support ticket related to API throttling sits idle for over 10 days due to back-and-forth communication gaps. The CSM only discovers the delay during a weekly sync — but by then, the trust is already shaken.
Support tickets, especially in high-touch accounts, are often on the critical path to onboarding or expansion. Yet, they’re not tracked as strategic blockers. According to HubSpot, 68% of customers switch vendors due to a poor support experience, and 86% expect real-time progress updates.
This is where ezRACI provides game-changing support. By ingesting tickets through integrations with tools like Salesforce, Zendesk, ServiceNow, Freshdesk, and Zoho Desk — or directly via our RESTful API — each ticket becomes a living task in a shared RACI matrix, visible across vendor and customer teams.
A common support update: “Ticket Status: Awaiting Customer.”
From the vendor side, this is logical — support agents need logs, screenshots, or other data to proceed. But from the customer’s point of view, it’s a pause in progress, often misunderstood or buried in email threads.
In one scenario, a global enterprise failed to provide requested logs for 9 days, unaware the lack of data had stalled resolution. The CSM had no insight until the customer escalated frustration.
With ezRACI, tickets marked “Awaiting Customer” can be mapped directly to customer-side tasks:
The customer’s security team = Responsible
Support engineer = Accountable
CSM = Informed
This real-time coordination allows the CSM to provide updates to leadership while coaching the customer through what’s needed — all with zero spreadsheet juggling.
When a support ticket becomes “Awaiting Development,” anxiety rises. Updates become sporadic. Customers begin to question whether anything is happening at all.
In a recent SaaS deployment, a high-severity bug was escalated to engineering. The ticket was updated twice in 21 days. The customer threatened non-renewal, stating, “We feel like we’re flying blind.”
ezRACI solves this by:
Assigning engineering = Responsible
Product = Consulted for prioritization
CSM = Accountable for comms
Customer = Informed
And with ezRACI’s RESTful API, integrations with Jira or Azure DevOps ensure that updates from engineering workflows are reflected in the matrix. No more siloed systems. No more manual updates.
Feature request tickets are the graveyard of goodwill. Customers hear, “We’ve logged it for future consideration,” and then months of silence.
In one instance, a customer’s feature request was captured in Zendesk, then passed to Aha! with no linkage. The CSM lost track. The customer brought it up three months later — only to learn it was never prioritized.
With ezRACI, feature requests can:
Be tracked across Zendesk, Aha!, and Jira
Display current sprint status
Assign PM as Responsible, UX as Consulted
Give customer visibility into decision-making and progress
Through our integrations or API, feature requests are elevated from the shadows into shared strategy.
CSMs often spend 5–10 hours per week chasing ticket updates, according to internal CS benchmarking studies. This time should be spent coaching customers toward adoption and success.
Instead, CSMs:
Email support agents for ticket updates
Manually track in spreadsheets
Copy-paste updates into Gainsight or Totango
ezRACI removes this burden by serving as the cross-functional visibility layer, syncing support cases directly into shared boards, timelines, and matrices. Now, the CSM has full visibility — without acting as the bottleneck.
When support cases block product usage, frustration becomes forecast risk.
A Gainsight case study showed that 25% of churned customers had unresolved support cases within 90 days of cancellation.
ezRACI empowers CSMs to:
Link tickets to CTAs
Show dependencies in the customer journey
Assign and surface blockers
Share timelines with customer-facing teams
When support performance is made transparent and collaborative, churn risk declines.
Here’s what white glove ticket management looks like in practice:
A ticket from Zendesk is auto-synced into ezRACI
The ticket’s metadata (priority, case ID, owner) is mapped into a matrix
Internal roles (support engineer, product manager) and customer roles (IT lead, security analyst) are assigned R, A, C, and I
Updates flow automatically through the matrix
This gives the CSM more than “notes.” It gives them a co-owned action plan.
Your customer’s ticket might be in Zendesk. Your engineering is in Jira. Your CSM workflows are in Gainsight. Your feature roadmap lives in Aha!
Without ezRACI, these tools don’t talk.
With ezRACI:
Our documented RESTful API integrates them into a single matrix
Data flows both ways — your systems stay your systems
Customers gain read/write access only where relevant
This becomes the central nervous system for customer-impacting work.
Customers don’t need everything fixed immediately — but they do need to know progress is being made.
In one case, a CSM used ezRACI to show:
Engineering had accepted the bug
QA was slotted for the next release
The fix was in UAT
The customer was thrilled — not because the bug was fixed that day, but because they could see the plan.
This visibility is what defines white glove.
True white glove support isn’t about overpromising or reacting faster. It’s about:
Providing transparency
Sharing responsibility
Keeping all players aligned
With ezRACI:
Support tickets become collaborative workflows
Feature requests are visible and trackable
CSMs stop chasing updates and start driving strategy
And with our RESTful API, any ticket system, any roadmap tool, any CS platform — becomes a node in your matrix.
The result? Fewer escalations. Happier customers. Smarter CSMs.
Start managing support with structure. Start with RACI. Start with ezRACI.