In the high-stakes world of B2B SaaS, Customer Success Managers (CSMs) walk a delicate tightrope. They are responsible not just for delivering value and managing relationships, but also for protecting revenue and identifying early warning signs that could threaten a customer’s long-term satisfaction. Yet, managing customer risk is more nuanced than ever. It’s no longer about waiting for a churn signal — it’s about reading the signals before they become a crisis.
In the high-stakes world of B2B SaaS, Customer Success Managers (CSMs) walk a delicate tightrope. They are responsible not just for delivering value and managing relationships, but also for protecting revenue and identifying early warning signs that could threaten a customer’s long-term satisfaction. Yet, managing customer risk is more nuanced than ever. It’s no longer about waiting for a churn signal — it’s about reading the signals before they become a crisis.
Risks can be subtle, slow-burning, and originate from multiple dimensions: product gaps, delayed onboarding, lack of executive buy-in, poor support experiences, or even internal leadership changes within the customer’s organization. With annual or multi-year subscription models, customers may not churn immediately, but risks can silently eat away at product adoption, satisfaction, and future renewal potential.
This guide aims to provide CSMs with a structured, strategic, and 360° approach to identifying, managing, and mitigating risk across the entire customer journey. It also highlights how modern tools like Gainsight can help log and prioritize risk CTAs — but why even the best CSM platforms must be extended with a more collaborative, cross-functional solution like ezRACI to fully illuminate and resolve risk.
Let’s dive in.
The definition of “customer risk” has evolved significantly. It’s no longer just about the obvious signs of churn — like customers not logging in or missing payments. Today, risk manifests subtly and across a broader spectrum of behaviors, relationships, and processes. It includes:
Customers not achieving time-to-value (TTV) within expected timeframes
Lack of executive sponsorship or leadership changes on the customer side
Growing dissatisfaction with support or response times
Product gaps that impair critical workflows
Competitive threats introduced by new stakeholders
Usage stagnation despite implementation success
What makes risk especially complex is that it isn’t always immediate. A customer could have 18 months left in their subscription contract — but if they’re no longer engaged, skeptical of ROI, or evaluating competitors, the account is already at long-term risk. On the other hand, technical onboarding delays or broken integrations could cause short-term frustrations that spiral into escalations — and jeopardize expansion.
To manage risk effectively, CSMs need more than a reactive checklist. They need a proactive lens and a risk framework that extends beyond surface-level signals.
CSMs sit at the intersection of product usage, relationship management, and value realization. This unique vantage point makes them ideally positioned to identify early warning signs of risk. Some of the most common — and critical — signals include:
A noticeable drop in user logins, especially among power users
Missed onboarding milestones or implementation delays
An increase in escalated support tickets without timely resolution
Passive or hostile behavior in business reviews or executive syncs
Customer stakeholders shifting focus toward competing tools
Decline in survey participation or negative feedback in CSAT/NPS
Budget freezes or headcount reductions signaled by the customer
Modern tools like Gainsight, Totango, and ChurnZero can help flag these events through automated health scores, sentiment tracking, and renewal forecasting. However, the real work begins once the CSM identifies these signs — transforming them into a structured risk management plan that can be executed collaboratively.
In platforms like Gainsight, CSMs can log a Risk Call-to-Action (CTA) to document emerging issues. Each CTA can include:
A priority score (low, medium, high)
A category (onboarding, support, product, strategic alignment, etc.)
Notes detailing the observed issue
Tasks assigned to internal team members for remediation
However, while this is a great place to start, CTAs typically exist within silos — visible only to internal stakeholders. Many risk scenarios are multi-threaded, requiring involvement from cross-functional teams. For example:
A feature gap may require a product manager to scope a workaround
A support issue might require engineering’s involvement for root cause analysis
A value perception risk may require marketing or an executive sponsor to step in
CSMs are left playing “traffic cop” — trying to coordinate actions across departments without any centralized, collaborative framework. This leads to delays, miscommunication, and risk resolution efforts that stall.
Gainsight’s Cockpit and similar internal dashboards are helpful — but they are inherently vendor-facing. That means the customer sees none of the coordination happening behind the scenes. This creates a massive blind spot.
Many risk scenarios cannot be resolved by the vendor alone. Customers often have dependencies and blockers on their side, such as:
IT teams failing to provision access or enable integrations
Change management delays due to slow internal communication
Poor stakeholder engagement at training and enablement sessions
Budgetary or organizational obstacles preventing expansion
Without making the customer part of the risk resolution process, CSMs limit their influence. This is why risk management must evolve from a vendor-centric model to a collaborative model.
CSMs need to adopt a 360° Risk Mindset — one that includes not only the internal efforts being made to address risks, but also the customer’s participation, accountability, and visibility into the plan.
This mindset includes:
Mapping all internal and external stakeholders involved in mitigating the risk
Defining ownership for each step in the resolution process
Identifying dependencies — both technical and procedural
Keeping both vendor and customer teams informed and aligned
The traditional CTA approach provides structure, but the 360° mindset transforms structure into shared commitment. This is especially important in complex enterprise environments where the customer’s own people, processes, and systems are often contributors to — and keys to resolving — the risk.
A RACI matrix — Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed — is the secret weapon most teams forget to use. In Customer Success, it offers a simple but powerful way to answer:
Who is doing the work (Responsible)?
Who owns the outcome (Accountable)?
Who needs to weigh in (Consulted)?
Who must be kept updated (Informed)?
Using a living RACI matrix — one that evolves as the situation unfolds — provides:
Clarity across internal departments
Clear visibility for the customer
Traceability of actions, decisions, and blockers
Platforms like ezRACI integrate directly with Gainsight, Totango, Salesforce, ClientSuccess, Planhat, HubSpot, and more to pull CTA data into a visual, editable RACI matrix. That matrix becomes the single source of truth for the risk action plan.
The most effective risk resolutions happen when the customer is actively involved.
Let’s say onboarding is delayed because their internal IT hasn’t provisioned API credentials. A traditional CTA would assign internal resources to “follow up.” But with ezRACI, you can:
Assign the Responsible party on the customer side (e.g., their IT lead)
Make your onboarding specialist Accountable for overall success
Add their Project Manager as Consulted
Keep your executive sponsor and theirs Informed
The matrix updates in real-time, shows status and comments, and eliminates guesswork. Everyone can see progress — and gaps — which accelerates resolution and drives alignment.
This approach moves customers from passive observers to active collaborators in their own success.
Imagine this: your customer is actively considering switching to a competitor due to a product limitation that affects their reporting.
Here’s how a CSM could address this using Gainsight and ezRACI:
Log a Risk CTA in Gainsight with a clear priority and root cause analysis
Sync the CTA into ezRACI and build a matrix
Assign Product as Consulted for roadmap analysis
Assign the CSM as Accountable
Add the customer’s Ops Lead as Responsible for validating the workaround
Involve Sales as Informed for renewal strategy alignment
Now, everyone — including the customer — knows who’s doing what. And because the matrix lives in a shared environment, updates are transparent. This approach can de-escalate tension, realign expectations, and drive collaboration.
Customer Success can’t manage risk in isolation. The entire organization — from Product to Engineering to Support — must adopt a risk-aware culture.
This includes:
Training frontline teams to escalate early warning signs
Building cross-functional playbooks for common risk scenarios
Using tools like ezRACI to institutionalize risk workflows
Conducting regular risk reviews across active accounts
A live RACI matrix becomes your org’s risk control center — where owners, collaborators, and dependencies are clear. When a risk is surfaced, it’s immediately mapped, assigned, and activated across departments.
We are moving toward a world where risk management is no longer reactive and siloed — but proactive and transparent.
By extending tools like Gainsight with ezRACI, CSMs can give their teams and their customers shared visibility into risk ownership and resolution. This is the future of Customer Success:
One where accountability is shared
One where alignment is real-time
One where customers see the path to resolution — not just the symptoms
When we treat customers as partners in solving risk — not just as recipients of updates — we unlock a new tier of trust and retention.
Start managing risk with structure. Start with RACI. Start with ezRACI.