Application Security (AppSec) vulnerabilities can expose organizations to significant security risks, making efficient remediation critical. Tools like Snyk, GitHub Security, Checkmarx, and other security scanning solutions help identify vulnerabilities, but managing the remediation process remains a challenge.
Application Security (AppSec) vulnerabilities can expose organizations to significant security risks, making efficient remediation critical. Tools like Snyk, GitHub Security, Checkmarx, and other security scanning solutions help identify vulnerabilities, but managing the remediation process remains a challenge.
Without a structured approach, vulnerabilities can slip through the cracks, leading to delays, compliance failures, or even data breaches. This is where a RACI matrix—and particularly ezRACI—becomes a game-changer for AppSec remediation.
Many organizations struggle with:
Ambiguous ownership – Who is responsible for fixing security vulnerabilities?
Poor cross-team coordination – Security, development, and compliance teams work in silos.
Missed remediation deadlines – Critical vulnerabilities remain unpatched for too long.
Lack of accountability – No clear escalation paths when vulnerabilities are not addressed.
Compliance risks – Inability to demonstrate due diligence for security audits.
Security scanning tools help identify issues, but they do not assign responsibility or track remediation efforts. This is why organizations need a RACI matrix to ensure vulnerabilities are properly addressed.
A RACI matrix (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) is a role assignment framework that defines responsibilities across teams.
Responsible (R) – The individual(s) executing the remediation task (e.g., developers fixing code issues).
Accountable (A) – The person who ensures the vulnerability is properly remediated (e.g., security lead or CISO).
Consulted (C) – Subject matter experts who provide input on remediation (e.g., DevOps, compliance officers).
Informed (I) – Stakeholders who need updates on remediation progress (e.g., executive leadership, compliance teams).
Below are example RACI matrices for common vulnerability scenarios detected by Snyk, GitHub Security, and Checkmarx.
Task | Developer | Security Lead | DevOps | Compliance | CISO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identify Vulnerability | C | R | I | I | I |
Develop Code Fix | R | C | C | I | I |
Review and Approve Fix | C | A | C | I | I |
Deploy Patch to Production | I | A | R | C | I |
Validate Fix & Close Ticket | I | A | C | C | R |
Task | Developer | Security Team | DevOps | Product Manager | CTO |
Identify Vulnerability | C | R | I | I | I |
Update Dependency | R | C | C | I | I |
Perform Regression Testing | C | R | C | I | I |
Deploy Patch | I | A | R | C | I |
Validate and Close Ticket | I | A | C | C | R |
Task | Developer | Security Lead | DevOps | Compliance | CISO |
Identify Secret Exposure | C | R | I | I | I |
Rotate and Remove Secret | R | C | C | I | I |
Implement Secret Management Policy | C | A | C | C | R |
Verify Fix | I | A | C | C | R |
Update Compliance Records | I | A | C | R | I |
Without a clear RACI structure, vulnerability remediation becomes chaotic and ineffective. Here’s what happens when organizations don’t use a RACI:
Confusion Over Ownership – Developers may assume security teams are responsible for fixing vulnerabilities, while security teams expect developers to handle them.
Delayed Remediation – Without accountability, vulnerabilities remain open for too long, increasing the attack surface.
Inconsistent Security Practices – Lack of coordination means security fixes might not align with compliance requirements.
Audit Failures – Regulatory bodies require clear documentation of security remediation efforts, which is difficult to provide without structured tracking.
Increased Risk of Breaches – Without a structured approach, high-risk vulnerabilities may go unaddressed, leading to potential exploits.
Integrates with AppSec scanning tools like Snyk, GitHub Security, and Checkmarx to ingest vulnerability findings.
Automatically assigns Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed roles based on predefined policies.
Integrates with Slack and Microsoft Teams to ensure real-time communication between security, development, and compliance teams.
Reduces reliance on emails and spreadsheets, preventing critical vulnerabilities from being ignored.
Visual dashboards provide clear tracking of security issues from discovery to resolution.
Gantt charts ensure remediation efforts align with security SLAs and deadlines.
Maintains audit logs of who took action on each vulnerability.
Helps organizations demonstrate due diligence during security audits for frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, and NIST 800-53.
Escalates overdue vulnerabilities to senior leadership.
Automated reminders ensure no security issue is forgotten.
Security tools like Snyk, GitHub Security, and Checkmarx are excellent for detecting vulnerabilities, but remediation requires a structured approach. Without a RACI matrix, organizations risk confusion, missed deadlines, compliance failures, and increased exposure to cyber threats.
ezRACI provides the missing link by: ✅ Automating RACI role assignments ✅ Enforcing accountability in security fixes ✅ Tracking remediation progress visually ✅ Ensuring compliance and audit readiness
By implementing ezRACI, organizations can move from chaotic vulnerability remediation to a streamlined, efficient, and accountable process.
Explore how ezRACI can help you structure, track, and enforce security remediation workflows with RACI automation, real-time collaboration, and Gantt-based tracking. Schedule a demo today!